Fraser Heath Financial Management Ltd
39 High Street
Chipping Sodbury
Bristol, South Glos
BS37 6BA
Tel: 01454 327788
Fax: 01454 327799

Registered Address: As Above
Registered in England, No:4357058

Fraser Heath are authorised and regulated by the FSA.

Explaining Market Value Reductions

posted 28 Jan 2010 04:51 by Miles Hendy   [ updated 28 Jan 2010 05:15 ]
At Fraser Heath we're passionate about helping policyholders really understand how their with-profits policy works. One of the key issues that influences this is language. Journalists and IFAs commenting in the press almost all refer to a Market Value Reduction (MVR) as a penalty. This is wrong. It's not a penalty and it matters that policyholders really understand this point.

We wanted to know whether any with-profits companies actually refer to MVRs as a penalty. We googled for articles where the words market value reduction and penalty all appeared in the same article. We found scores of newspaper articles wrongly referring to it as a penalty and the first relevant hit we found from an insurance company was the 94th article to appear where Standard Life stated:

An MVR is not a deduction or penalty. If there is an MVR, it means that the plan value, taking into account the investment returns on the with-profits fund’s assets, and any smoothing, is lower than the amount payable when guarantees apply, so if there is an MVR it demonstrates how valuable the guarantee is.

Please take a moment to really understand that statement. It's critical. The MVR is NOT a penalty. If there's a guarantee to not apply an MVR, then that's a truly valuable guarantee.

My blog article on Market Value Reductions are NOT penalties explains this in more detail.