At Fraser Heath we're passionate about helping policyholders really understand how their with-profits policy works. One of the key issues that influences this is language. Journalists and IFAs commenting in the press almost all refer to a Market Value Reduction (MVR) as a penalty. This is wrong. It's not a penalty and it matters that policyholders really understand this point. We wanted to know whether any with-profits companies actually refer to MVRs as a penalty. We googled for articles where the words market value reduction and penalty all appeared in the same article. We found scores of newspaper articles wrongly referring to it as a penalty and the first relevant hit we found from an insurance company was the 94th article to appear where Standard Life stated: An MVR is not a deduction or penalty. If there is an MVR, it means that
the plan value, taking into account the investment returns on the
with-profits fund’s assets, and any smoothing, is lower than the amount
payable when guarantees apply, so if there is an MVR it demonstrates
how valuable the guarantee is.Please take a moment to really understand that statement. It's critical. The MVR is NOT a penalty. If there's a guarantee to not apply an MVR, then that's a truly valuable guarantee. My blog article on Market Value Reductions are NOT penalties explains this in more detail. |




